WebOct 9, 1999 · Section 4958 (f) (1) (A) uses the following definition: “any person who was, at any time during the 5-year period ending on the date of such transaction, in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of the organization.” Webof IRC 4958 is to impose sanctions on the influential persons in charities and social welfare organizations who receive excessive economic benefits from the organization, rather than to punish the exempt organization itself. On January 23, 2002, final regulations interpreting IRC 4958 were published in the Federal Register, 67 F.R. 3076.

Tax Issues in Compensating the Tax-Exempt Executive

WebI.R.C. § 958 (b) (1) —. In applying paragraph (1) (A) of section 318 (a), stock owned by a nonresident alien individual (other than a foreign trust or foreign estate) shall not be … WebOct 25, 2012 · Pursuant to IRC section 4958, the IRS is authorized to impose the following penalties: 25% excise tax of the excess benefit on the disqualified person who received the excess benefit; and an additional 200% excise tax of the excess benefit if the violation is not corrected within the taxable period. 10% excise tax of the excess benefit on the ... philip white hot sauce

26 CFR 53.4958-6 - Rebuttable presumption that a transaction

WebIRC 4966. Donors, donor advisors, and related persons are also subject to excise taxes if they receive more than an incidental benefit from a donor-advised fund. IRC 4967. The 4958 excess benefit transaction taxes were extended to include donors to DAFs and investment advisers to sponsoring organizations. IRC 4958(c), (f). WebSection 4958 (f) (1) defines disqualified person, with respect to any transaction, as any person who was in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of an … WebSection 4958 (a) (1) imposes a tax equal to 25 percent of the excess benefit on each excess benefit transaction. The section 4958 (a) (1) tax shall be paid by any disqualified person … try free math